From submission to review

A clear workflow for every person involved.

See how ClinAssess moves clinical work from student submission through assessment, integrity review, feedback, and academic oversight.

From submission to review

A clear workflow for every person involved.

ClinAssess keeps the handoffs visible: the student submits, staff assess, and academic leads see the evidence needed to manage progression.

01ConfigureProgramme setup
02SubmitStudent record
03AssessClinical review
04VerifyIntegrity checks
05ProgressEvidence-led view
01

Set up the programme

Administrators configure users, curriculum, clinical sites, assessment formats, and the people responsible for review.

02

Capture the clinical work

Students complete their profiles and upload histories or records linked to the relevant clinical context.

03

Assess at the point of care

Clinical staff select the student and site, complete structured evaluation fields, add scores and feedback, and sign the assessment.

04

Review and resolve

Potential duplicates, plagiarism signals, absences, and moderation items are surfaced for the appropriate reviewer.

05

Understand progression

Students see results and feedback while academic leads use analytics, audit logs, and complete records to identify gaps.

Designed around roles

Same system. Different responsibilities.

S

Students

Upload histories, follow status, read feedback, view results, manage profile details, and understand what remains outstanding.

E

Examiners and clinical staff

Create and review assessments, capture structured scores, attach comments, and manage the student context needed for a fair evaluation.

A

Administrators and HODs

Manage users, clinical sites, curriculum, progression, analytics, moderation, duplicate checks, and audit records.